+1

It does not allow me to continue to see the second page if I don't make
choices on the first one.

- Jie

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Great to see so many proposals!
>
> Is it intentional that we have to review them in small subsets? It's hard
> to tell what to consider as an "Average" proposal when you can only see a
> small subset at a time. Just curious on the reasoning behind that.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Dave Lester <d...@davelester.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> A total of 63 proposals were submitted for #MesosCon[1], up
>> significantly from 24 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>> last year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up
>> for community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
>> should be included in the program.
>>
>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>> segmented them based upon three loose themes: Frameworks, Users / Ops,
>> and Mesos Internals and Extensions. We encourage you to review proposals
>> based upon one theme, or all three!
>>
>> *Frameworks (18 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015Frameworks Talks on how
>> frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>
>> *Users / Ops (28 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015UsersOps A combination
>> of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>
>> *Mesos Internals and Extensions (17 Proposals):*
>> bit.ly/MesosCon2015InternalsExt Features of the Mesos core, or software
>> integrations with the internals of Mesos. Some proposals have overlap
>> with frameworks and ops, but most are focused on the foundational
>> aspects of how Mesos works.
>>
>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
>> you didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your participation! The forms will close on March
>> 4th 2015, two weeks from today.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> Links:
>>
>>   1. http://mesoscon.org
>>
>
>

Reply via email to