Hi Dave, How many submissions are we looking to accept this year?
Tim > On Feb 21, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Dave Lester <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Steve and Pablo for the feedback. > > Regarding the system of rating proposals: this is similar to what we used > last year, however last year we also had "strongly accept" and "strongly > reject" options which in my personal opinion were helpful for determining the > best-of-the-best. As a speaker subcommittee, we decided to simplify the > review process this time around by offering only three options. We may > reconsider this for next year. > > Regarding the selection process: the MesosCon program committee will > ultimately determine the event programs -- a list of those who are members is > available here: > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/mesoscon/program/programcommittee. > Program committee members will be completing the same review process as > everyone else in the community, and we plan to use the feedback we receive as > signals for what to select for the program, and inform tracks for the event. > > So far we have over 40 reviews for each of the themes we've shared, and while > the system for feedback may not be perfect there are already some clear > signals in the data about what folks want to hear and what they'd like to > pass on. We'll do our best to be transparent about the process moving > forward, and have a strong feedback loop with the community to ensure that > your voice and opinions are given weight in the decisions of the program > committee. > > If you have additional questions, feel free to ask on-list. I think having > these discussions in the open is helpful, and also keeps us (the program > committee) accountable to the community. > > Dave > >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015, at 04:41 AM, Steve Domin wrote: >> All of them look great indeed. Didn't reject any as well. >> >> I find the wording a bit annoying as I didn't really find any talk >> "average", I just selected "accept" for the one I really want to hear about >> more than anything else. >> >> On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Pablo Delgado <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe a scale of 1 to 5 makes more sense. >> >> I did "Accept" on ALL talks but 3 that consider "Average" but only on the >> basis of repeated subject. Did not reject Anything. >> >> I wonder how the selection is going to be made, since all of them are great >> talks! >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Jie Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> It does not allow me to continue to see the second page if I don't make >> choices on the first one. >> >> >> - Jie >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Great to see so many proposals! >> >> Is it intentional that we have to review them in small subsets? It's hard to >> tell what to consider as an "Average" proposal when you can only see a small >> subset at a time. Just curious on the reasoning behind that. >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Dave Lester <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> A total of 63 proposals were submitted for #MesosCon[1], up >> significantly from 24 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to >> last year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up >> for community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what >> should be included in the program. >> >> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve >> segmented them based upon three loose themes: Frameworks, Users / Ops, >> and Mesos Internals and Extensions. We encourage you to review proposals >> based upon one theme, or all three! >> >> *Frameworks (18 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015Frameworks Talks on how >> frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos. >> >> *Users / Ops (28 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015UsersOps A combination >> of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and >> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc). >> >> *Mesos Internals and Extensions (17 Proposals):* >> bit.ly/MesosCon2015InternalsExt Features of the Mesos core, or software >> integrations with the internals of Mesos. Some proposals have overlap >> with frameworks and ops, but most are focused on the foundational >> aspects of how Mesos works. >> >> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions >> you didn't see proposed but would like to attend. >> >> Thanks in advance for your participation! The forms will close on March >> 4th 2015, two weeks from today. >> >> Dave >> >> >> Links: >> >> 1. http://mesoscon.org >
