1. Mesos Worker (or just Mesos node) 2. Mesos Worker 3. No, but if we do then Leader or Director or Controller 4. Deprecation cycle, documentation, etc. Provide aliases for a release or two.
Thanks for raising this topic; it's been on my mind for a while. As for why I think this matters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microaggression_theory On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> wrote: > There has been much discussion about finding a less offensive name than > "Slave", and many of these thoughts have been captured in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 > > I would like to open up the discussion on this topic for one week, and if > we cannot arrive at a lazy consensus, I will draft a proposal from the > discussion and call for a VOTE. > Here are the questions I would like us to answer: > 1. What should we call the "Mesos Slave" node/host/machine? > 2. What should we call the "mesos-slave" process (could be the same)? > 3. Do we need to rename Mesos Master too? > > Another topic worth discussing is the deprecation process, but we don't > necessarily need to decide on that at the same time as deciding the new > name(s). > 4. How will we phase in the new name and phase out the old name? > > Please voice your thoughts and opinions below. > > Thanks! > -Adam- > > P.S. My personal thoughts: > 1. Mesos Worker [Node] > 2. Mesos Worker or Agent > 3. No > 4. Carefully >
