I'm working on a quick fix to fix the test, if we can just apply this we shouldn't worry about this anymore.
Tim On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jie Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim, maybe just remove CgroupsCpushareIsolatorProcess > from CgroupsIsolatorTypes and add a TODO there for this release? > > We can definitely work around it (like you said). > > - Jie > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That test is failing because of a wierd bug in CentOS 7 not naming the >> cgroups correctly (or at least not following the pattern every other >> OS). >> >> I filed a CentOS bug but no response so far, if we want to fix it we >> will have to work around this problem by hardcoding another cgroup >> name to test cpuacct,cpu. >> >> Tim >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Happy to cut another RC. >> > >> > IIUC, https://reviews.apache.org/r/37684 doesn't fix the below test. >> > >> > [ FAILED ] UserCgroupIsolatorTest/1.ROOT_CGROUPS_UserCgroup, where >> > TypeParam = mesos::internal::slave::CgroupsCpushareIsolatorProcess >> > >> > Is someone working on fixing that (MESOS-3294 >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3294>)? If yes, I would >> wait a >> > day or two to get that in. >> > >> > Any other issues people have encountered with RC1? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Niklas Nielsen <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> If it is that easy to fix, why not get it in? >> >> >> >> How about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3053 (which >> >> Haosdent ran into)? >> >> >> >> On 27 August 2015 at 15:36, Jie Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Niklas, >> >>> >> >>> This is the known problem reported by Marco. I am OK with both because >> >>> the linux filesystem isolator cannot be used in 0.24.0. >> >>> >> >>> If you guys prefer to cut another RC, here is the patch that needs to >> be >> >>> cherry picked: >> >>> >> >>> commit 3ecd54320397c3a813d555f291b51778372e273b >> >>> Author: Greg Mann <[email protected]> >> >>> Date: Fri Aug 21 13:21:10 2015 -0700 >> >>> >> >>> Added symlink test for /bin, lib, and /lib64 when preparing test >> root >> >>> filesystem. >> >>> >> >>> Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37684 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Niklas Nielsen <[email protected] >> > >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> -1: sudo make check on centos 7 >> >>>> >> >>>> [----------] Global test environment tear-down >> >>>> >> >>>> [==========] 793 tests from 121 test cases ran. (606946 ms total) >> >>>> >> >>>> [ PASSED ] 786 tests. >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] 7 tests, listed below: >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] UserCgroupIsolatorTest/1.ROOT_CGROUPS_UserCgroup, where >> >>>> TypeParam = mesos::internal::slave::CgroupsCpushareIsolatorProcess >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_ChangeRootFilesystem >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_VolumeFromSandbox >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_VolumeFromHost >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] >> >>>> LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_VolumeFromHostSandboxMountPoint >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] >> >>>> LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_PersistentVolumeWithRootFilesystem >> >>>> >> >>>> [ FAILED ] MesosContainerizerLaunchTest.ROOT_ChangeRootfs >> >>>> >> >>>> Configured with: >> >>>> >> >>>> ../mesos/configure --prefix=/home/vagrant/releases/0.24.0/ >> >>>> --disable-python >> >>>> >> >>>> On 26 August 2015 at 17:00, Khanduja, Vaibhav < >> [email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> +1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Pinging the thread for more (binding) votes. Hopefully people have >> >>>>> caught >> >>>>> > up with emails after Mesos madness. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:28 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> +1 >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> OS: Ubutnu 14.04 >> >>>>> >> Verify command: sudo make -j8 check >> >>>>> >> Compiler: Both gcc4.8 and clang3.5 >> >>>>> >> Configuration: default configuration >> >>>>> >> Result: all tests(828 tests) pass >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> MESOS-3053 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3053> is >> >>>>> because >> >>>>> >> need update add iptable first. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, haosdent <[email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Could not >> >>>>> >>> pass >> DockerContainerizerTest.ROOT_DOCKER_Launch_Executor_Bridged in >> >>>>> Ubuntu >> >>>>> >>> 14.04. Already have a issue for this >> >>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3053, it is >> acceptable? >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Marco Massenzio < >> >>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> All tests (including ROOT) pass on: >> >>>>> >>>> Ubuntu 14.04 (physical box) >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> All non-ROOT tests pass on: >> >>>>> >>>> CentOS 7 (VirtualBox VM) >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> Known issue (MESOS-3050) for ROOT tests on CentOS 7, >> non-blocker. >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> *Marco Massenzio* >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> *Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com < >> >>>>> http://codetrips.com>* >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Vinod Kone < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> 0.24.0 includes the following: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> Experimental support for v1 scheduler HTTP API! >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> This release also wraps up support for fetcher. >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The CHANGELOG for the release is available at: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=0.24.0-rc1 >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The candidate for Mesos 0.24.0 release is available at: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.24.0-rc1/mesos-0.24.0.tar.gz >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The tag to be voted on is 0.24.0-rc1: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=commit;h=0.24.0-rc1 >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.24.0-rc1/mesos-0.24.0.tar.gz.md5 >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The signature of the tarball can be found at: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.24.0-rc1/mesos-0.24.0.tar.gz.asc >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The PGP key used to sign the release is here: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mesos/KEYS >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The JAR is up in Maven in a staging repository here: >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemesos-1064 >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.24.0! >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> The vote is open until Fri Aug 21 15:24:05 PDT 2015 and >> passes if >> >>>>> a >> >>>>> >>>>> majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.24.0 >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> Vinod >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> -- >> >>>>> >>> Best Regards, >> >>>>> >>> Haosdent Huang >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> -- >> >>>>> >> Best Regards, >> >>>>> >> Haosdent Huang >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >
