Actually looking at the RC1 jar more closely, it looks like the classes are
built for 1.6 (our pom file
<https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/java/mesos.pom.in#L117>actually
sets this via maven compiler plugin).

$ file ~/Downloads/Executor.class

/Users/vinod/Downloads/Executor.class: compiled Java class data, version
50.0 (Java 1.6)

The confusing part (for me) is that jar's manifest says "Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_60"
but AFAICT that just means JDK7 was used to build the JAR. It has nothing
to do with the version of the generated byte code.

So, I think we are OK here.


On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Kevin Sweeney <kevi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm generally in favor of dropping support for JDK6 as it's been
> end-of-life for years.
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +user
>>
>> So looks like this issue is related to JDK6 and not my maven password
>> settings.
>>
>> Related ASF ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-85
>>
>> The reason it worked for me, when I tagged RC1, was because I also
>> pointed my maven to use JDK7.
>>
>> So we have couple options here:
>>
>> #1) (Easy) Do same thing with RC2 as we did for RC1. This does mean the
>> artifacts we upload to nexus will be compiled with JDK7. IIUC, if any JVM
>> based frameworks are still on JDK6 they can't link in the new artifacts?
>>
>> #2) (Harder) As mentioned in the ticket, have maven compile Mesos jar
>> with JDK6 but use JDK7 when uploading. Not sure how easy it is to adapt our
>> Mesos build tool chain for this. Anyone has expertise in this area?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I re-encrypted the maven passwords and that seemed to have done the
>>> trick. Thanks Adam!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Update your ~/.m2/settings.xml?
>>>> Also check that the output of `gpg --list-keys` and `--list-sigs`
>>>> matches
>>>> the keypair you expect
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I definitely had to create a new gpg key because my previous one
>>>> expired! I
>>>> > uploaded them id.apache and our SVN repo containing KEYS.
>>>> >
>>>> > Do I need to do anything specific for maven?
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Haven't seen that one. Are you sure you've got your gpg key
>>>> properly set
>>>> > up
>>>> > > with Maven?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > I'm getting the following error when running ./support/tag.sh.
>>>> Has any
>>>> > of
>>>> > > > the recent release managers seen this one before?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>>> > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy
>>>> > (default-deploy)
>>>> > > on
>>>> > > > project mesos: Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer
>>>> artifact
>>>> > > > org.apache.mesos:mesos:jar:0.24.0-rc1 from/to
>>>> apache.releases.https (
>>>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2
>>>> ):
>>>> > > > java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not generate DH keypair: Prime
>>>> size
>>>> > > must
>>>> > > > be multiple of 64, and can only range from 512 to 1024
>>>> (inclusive) ->
>>>> > > [Help
>>>> > > > 1]
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Vinod Kone <
>>>> vinodk...@apache.org>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Update:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > There are 3 outstanding tickets (all related to flaky tests),
>>>> that we
>>>> > > are
>>>> > > > > trying to resolve. Any help fixing those (esp. MESOS-3050
>>>> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3050>) would be
>>>> > > > appreciated!
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Planning to cut an RC as soon as they are fixed (assuming no
>>>> new ones
>>>> > > > crop
>>>> > > > > up).
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Thanks,
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:50 AM, James DeFelice <
>>>> > > > james.defel...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >> Awesome - thanks so much!
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Bernd Mathiske <
>>>> > be...@mesosphere.io>
>>>> > > > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> > I just committed it. Thanks, James!
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > > On Aug 13, 2015, at 9:53 PM, James DeFelice <
>>>> > > > james.defel...@gmail.com
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > > Hi Vinod,
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > > Would *really* like to see
>>>> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2841
>>>> > > > >> > > in 0.24.0. Currently in review.
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > > Any chance that can make it in?
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Vinod Kone <
>>>> > vinodk...@apache.org
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > >> Removed the target versions for all unresolved tickets
>>>> (except
>>>> > > for
>>>> > > > >> HTTP
>>>> > > > >> > >> scheduler API ones) targeted for 0.24.0
>>>> > > > >> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2562>
>>>> > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > >> > >> Hoping to cut an RC tomorrow.
>>>> > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Vinod Kone <
>>>> > vinodk...@gmail.com
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> Hi,
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> The tracking ticket for the 0.24.0 release is
>>>> > > > >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2562
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> The main feature of this release is going to be v1 (beta)
>>>> > > release
>>>> > > > of
>>>> > > > >> > the
>>>> > > > >> > >>> HTTP scheduler API.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> Hoping to cut an RC early next week, so if there's
>>>> anything
>>>> > you
>>>> > > > >> > >> absolutely
>>>> > > > >> > >>> need to be in 0.24.0 please land them by EOW.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Adam Bordelon <
>>>> > > > a...@mesosphere.io>
>>>> > > > >> > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> Thanks, Vinod.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> I've got a handful of JIRAs I'd really like to see land
>>>> in
>>>> > > > 0.24.0.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2559 Do
>>>> not use
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> RunTaskMessage.framework_id.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2600 Add
>>>> > /reserve
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> /unreserve endpoints on the master for dynamic
>>>> reservation
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2998
>>>> Disable
>>>> > > > >> Persistent
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> Volumes, Dynamic Reservations via master flags
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3050
>>>> Failing
>>>> > ROOT_
>>>> > > > >> tests
>>>> > > > >> > in
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> 0.23.0-rc3 on CentOS 7.1
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3079 `sudo
>>>> make
>>>> > > > >> > distcheck`
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> fails on Ubuntu 14.04 (and possibly other OSes too)
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> I understand your desire to untarget the majority of the
>>>> > > tickets,
>>>> > > > >> > since
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> it's a time-based release, but we might want to keep
>>>> some of
>>>> > > > these
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> targeted
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> so we can track the priority issues. When the actual
>>>> rc1 cut
>>>> > > date
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> approaches, it's pretty easy to aggressively push
>>>> things out
>>>> > of
>>>> > > > the
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> release
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> that haven't made it. Let me know what you think.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> Cheers,
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> -A-
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Vinod Kone <
>>>> > > > vinodk...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > >> > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> I will be the release manager for the upcoming release
>>>> (ETA
>>>> > > > early
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> August).
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> To prep for the release (and make my life easy) I'm
>>>> planning
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > >> > remove
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> the
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> target versions for all *unresolved* tickets that have
>>>> a
>>>> > > target
>>>> > > > >> > >> version
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> 0.24.0.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> I would like folks to explicitly set the target
>>>> version to
>>>> > > > 0.24.0*
>>>> > > > >> > for
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> tickets they want to absolutely land in the next
>>>> release
>>>> > > > (keeping
>>>> > > > >> in
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> mind
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> the time frame). If you are unsure, please reach out
>>>> to me
>>>> > or
>>>> > > > >> reply
>>>> > > > >> > to
>>>> > > > >> > >>>> this
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> thread.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> The main blocking feature for this release is going to
>>>> the
>>>> > new
>>>> > > > >> HTTP
>>>> > > > >> > >> API.
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> Vinod
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> P.S. If things go according to plan we might make this
>>>> 1.0
>>>> > > > >> release!
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > >> > > --
>>>> > > > >> > > James DeFelice
>>>> > > > >> > > 585.241.9488 (voice)
>>>> > > > >> > > 650.649.6071 (fax)
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> --
>>>> > > > >> James DeFelice
>>>> > > > >> 585.241.9488 (voice)
>>>> > > > >> 650.649.6071 (fax)
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to