Is this the right project? https://github.com/tomas-abrahamsson/gpb
If so, it seems to support package namespacing, just needs to be enabled: "Gpb can optionally make use of the package attribute by prepending the name of the package to every contained message type (if defined), which is useful to avoid name clashes of message types across packages." On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Sargun Dhillon <[email protected]> wrote: > It turns out that not all protobufs compilers support dealing with > packages correctly. The specific one I'm hitting an issue with today > is gpb, the Erlang protobuf compiler. It's also a little bit weird in > Python, and some of the other protobuf compilers. After doing a little > bit of poking around, it appears we're doing this in only one place: > > Message: > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto#L1123-L1132 > > Reference: > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto#L344-L346 > > Given the reference is literally just wrapping the other one directly, > I'm not even sure of what the immediate point of his is. Instead, > could we move to a flat namespace, so that for us who don't have > compilers that can handle protobuf packages, we can just treat all of > the pb files as one giant flat file? > > I don't think this would take much change for the existing code, but > it's more about the future. >
