Tarjei Huse wrote:
> To the developers of midgard 2.0.
>
> How hard would it be to make the field selections more dynamic? One thing is
> adding fields into the tables, f.x attachement table (as I have suggested
> earlyer) another is creating a new table and having a complete set of
> midgard functions. Both could be a quite interesting way of thinking
> midgard. Lets say that the distro source comes with an con file of some sort
> that defines all fields and soforth in the default tables, and then the
> admin can add a new table and there will be a corosponding list of
> mgd_dothis_"tablename" functions.
>
> Is it an idea of is it a way of creating havoc?
It's not only an idea, it's going to be the very basis for 2.0.
Flexible property lists, not attached to but actually part of the
object, is going to be the standard. So not only could you add new
properties to existing objects, but actually create new 'kinds' of
objects on the fly.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
