>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 12/6/00, 5:03:34 PM, Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding RE:
[midgard-user] RFE/Innocent question: 'fax' field?:
> TO the developers of midgard 2.0.
> How hard would it be to make the field selections more dynamic? One thing
is
> adding fields into the tables, f.x attachement table (as I have suggested
> earlyer) another is creating a new table and having a complete set of
> midgard functions. Both could be a quite interesting way of thinking
> midgard. Lets say that the distro source comes with an con file of some
sort
> that defines all fields and soforth in the default tables, and then the
> admin can add a new table and there will be a corosponding list of
> mgd_dothis_"tablename" functions.
> Is it an idea of is it a way of creating havoc?
Actually, IIRC some work on this has already been done by David for the
1.4 branch, but it hasn't made it into the feature-list for 1.4-stable.
Armand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
