On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:49:32PM +0200, Emiliano wrote:
> Miles Scruggs wrote:
>
> > I'm in the process of setting up a clustering solution for two midgard
> > boxes. Just wanted to get some input before I start causing myself
> > headaches.
> >
> > The IP load balancing will be round robin DNS until I impliment a better
> > solution (suggestions wanted)
>
> Maybe Eddie? http://eddie.sourceforge.net/
Stonesoft has some software that allows easy clustering of Midgard servers.
> > Database replication will be mysql built in replication
> >
> > File(blobs and images) replication will be with rsync
> > http://rsync.samba.org until I get a better one setup, such as
> > InterMezzo http://www.stelias.com
>
> Maybe NFS or CODA? But that will hit your network for every request.
> rsync will use less resources.
Repligard now fully supports BLOBs transfer within export file, as well as
correct placement of them to the blobdir.
>
> > The admin interface will only attached (accessed) on one box (master)
> > since the file and database replication is master to slave only. The
> > sites on the other hand will be attached to both boxes.
> >
> > Is this going to work? I'm I going to run into any problems with
> > midgard in this configuration? Thanks for your input
>
> I don't see why not, but I've never tried anything like this.
This will work. But since original MySQL replication is used, it will be
hard to separate Admin site from data and thus it will be also at the
slave boxes as well.
--
Sincerely yours, Alexander Bokovoy
The Midgard Project | www.midgard-project.org | ALT Linux Team
Minsk Linux Users Group | www.minsk-lug.net | www.altlinux.ru
-- The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
