[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I couldn't find the pattern "]]>[^<]" anywhere in that file; in fact, "]]>" is always > followed by another "<"; btw: I looked for the GUID >'9bde96d7f83f8430710e95343ecb6990' > in the XML file and that wasn't there either. You couldn't maybe send your version of > the file since it appears to be different?
I'd sooner take a look at your file. Mine could well be outdated (although the guid is supposed to stay the same), and I've been playing with it with some xml tools. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
