> for most purposes in Bremgard that is a consequent followup for Asgard. > > However I would have never betted that out of all victims snippet > > inclusion is the first one. > > > > Maybe it's still a bug in midgard ? > > Possibly. The path was the same regardless of whether auth was on or > not? >
hello emile, I reopened the former thread 'migration of tables' where I concentrated on sitegroup.id and topic.sitegroup during import. Yes, the path was or currently is http://insight.kn-bremen.de:8080/Guild/home (guest+Bremen/info99) where the code-init held the bremgard_walk_topic function from the path /Bremgard/Functions/guard. Right after switching on auth for host-prefix /Guild the light for every other snippet went on. That means that the whole site worked only by authentication. There was just another surprise: Another page ,/Guild/images, was the only completely missing blob attached page. Whereas the other blob attached page /Guild/home/images was imported successfully. The missing images couldnot be imported until now although I found the records in the xml-file. But instead they could be restored easily by copying /Asgard/images to bremgards /Guild. They are equal. Coming back on the start of the discussion I wonder if anyone already exchanged complete sitegroups for migration purposes. Every bug or mistake can lead to a disaster or a showstopper failure. But it looks as if the design is not a general problem. One problem is still to replicate first only the small 'head' of a sitegroup that has to be importet as admin of SG0. This can only be done immediately after a sitegroup was created, right ? dieter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
