Ken Pooley wrote:

> > From: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:16 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [midgard-user] Midgard-lite and publicity
> >
> > Suggestion:
> >
> > 1. post each newsitem to it from a nr. of developers (alexander,
> > emile, bergie,
> > rambo, armand+++) to an imap account.
> > 2. Instead of sending the items out, have a crondjob move'em to
> > articles the
> > frontpage of www.midgard-project.org every hour.
> > 3. Lower the barriers of entry so that emile can write "Ok, now I
> > fixed the bug
> > that prevents php2.0 users from using midgard."
> > 4. Also post (dynamicly) new questions from the faq + new
> > anotations from the
> > manual.
>
> I never did get to answer this but I think this is a sound idea. I do this
> there needs to be a structural/persecptual difference between a developer's
> note/announcement and a longer article...may be three information tracks on
> the homepage are needed. One for 'headlines' (longer comprehensive articles)
> a shorter snippet tracks for quick announcements ( OK bug fixed..) and
> something that has the latest user submitted faq/annotation/whatever from
> the general using public. ( that should have some sort of approval gate to
> keep pokiman announcements to a minimum......)

Sounds great (both ideas). I didn't respond to this since it sounded
like a rather 'obviously good' idea. I didn't figure it'd need approval
or whatnot. The community is you all, etc etc, bladibla. :)

Having the faq additions/annotations available as web or mail announcements (other
than the 'a note was added' as I once implemented it would indeed be
great.

Emile



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to