pp wrote: > hmmm.... all records in cache table have sitegroup field=0.
the sitegroup field in the cache table is not actually used. > I understand that page field is number of page in cache directory? Yes. > So why there is no pages from properly working sites? Don't know. You said the cached files look OK? They do here. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
