> It would be interesting to get some short comments from the list about > how large sites you're managing with midgard. > > How many articles, how many events, what load, etc?
Mostly depends how You project Your sites. Using midgard will always be faster than using similiar queries with php-mysql scripting. > Soon, the site I've been implementing will go public. On the current > site we have only about 300 unique visits per day, but we're hoping > that the more interactiv content that will be possible with midgard > also will hike upp our load. Personally I do not see any slow down for sites with 1000 visits per day or 50 - 60 thousands hits per day. > Anyhow it would be interesting to get some numbers to compare with, is > it bearable with 1000 articles, how about 10 000? What about nadmin, I > guess the tree view will go bezerk at 10 000 articles in the same > topic. =) This is midgard application and browser specific problem. For such sites You must create specific admin interface. Or You should. And indeed, nadmin makes browser "tired" and slow while listing for example 2000 unapproved articles. Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
