Gotcha.  Maybe I'll see about starting a 1.4 version of the tutorial.  Not
sure if I'll have time, though.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, this is now sorted out.
>
> For refernce, you can sign up and commit your own changes to the Nutch
> wiki.
>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> lewis
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > BTW, found a typo in the tutorial.  It has the following.
> >
> > bin/nutch parse $1
> >
> >
> > And it should be this.
> >
> > bin/nutch parse $s1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > OK I understand. I think the main task with the documentation was that
> > the
> > > fundamental architecture changed between Nutch 1.2 & 1.3. Generally
> > > speaking
> > > the community appears to understand this, but I fully recognise that
> > there
> > > is still a good deal of work to do. Thanks for pointing this out.
> > >
> > > Lewis
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not looking for anything to be created.  It's just that a lot of
> > the
> > > > documentation seems to be marked as needing updates for 1.3 and I was
> > > > wondering what the timeline for completing it was.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > What documentation apart from what we have marked as in
> construction
> > or
> > > > > TODO
> > > > > on the wiki would you like to see created?
> > > > >
> > > > > It has been a pretty long process getting these resources
> up-to-date,
> > > > > however we are getting there!
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BTW, do you know what the timeline is to have the documentation
> > > > updated
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > 1.3?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is as we speak. Lewis did quite a good job for the wiki docs
> on
> > > 1.3.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Lewis*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Reply via email to