I'll see, but we're not at the point to deploy to a hadoop cluster yet.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:39 AM, lewis john mcgibbney <
[email protected]> wrote:

> 1.3 will cover 1.4. The main point was regarding the change in architecture
> when taking into consideration the new runtime directory structure which
> was
> introduced in Nutch 1.3.
>
> Feel free to join me on getting a Hadoop tutorial for 1.4. I'ts been on the
> agenda but somewhat shelved.
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Gotcha.  Maybe I'll see about starting a 1.4 version of the tutorial.
>  Not
> > sure if I'll have time, though.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, this is now sorted out.
> > >
> > > For refernce, you can sign up and commit your own changes to the Nutch
> > > wiki.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing this out.
> > >
> > > lewis
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > BTW, found a typo in the tutorial.  It has the following.
> > > >
> > > > bin/nutch parse $1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And it should be this.
> > > >
> > > > bin/nutch parse $s1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK I understand. I think the main task with the documentation was
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > fundamental architecture changed between Nutch 1.2 & 1.3. Generally
> > > > > speaking
> > > > > the community appears to understand this, but I fully recognise
> that
> > > > there
> > > > > is still a good deal of work to do. Thanks for pointing this out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lewis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not looking for anything to be created.  It's just that a lot
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > documentation seems to be marked as needing updates for 1.3 and I
> > was
> > > > > > wondering what the timeline for completing it was.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What documentation apart from what we have marked as in
> > > construction
> > > > or
> > > > > > > TODO
> > > > > > > on the wiki would you like to see created?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It has been a pretty long process getting these resources
> > > up-to-date,
> > > > > > > however we are getting there!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BTW, do you know what the timeline is to have the
> > documentation
> > > > > > updated
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > 1.3?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It is as we speak. Lewis did quite a good job for the wiki
> docs
> > > on
> > > > > 1.3.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Lewis*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Lewis*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Reply via email to