Please note that we will be dropping the schema-solr4 in Nutch and merging
the content into schema.xml. It is not good for us to maintain two schemas.
Thanks
Lewis

On Sunday, June 16, 2013, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> If you're able to patch this up and submit your patch I'll try it out
tomo as I'm doing my upgrade then anyway and it would really help to get it
tested.
> Thanks if you're able to do so.
> Lewis
>
> On Sunday, June 16, 2013, Tony Mullins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lewis, Solr 4.3.0 expects _version_ field  and that was missing in my
>> schema.  And the patch also doesn't include this field in
Schema-Solr4.xml.
>> Besides that I was also missing some .jars in my Solr class path.
>>
>> Tony.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The patch includes a new schema for 4.X
>>> Can you elborate on "It doesn''t work when yoou try to do 'browse' in
Solr
>>> 4.3.0.", this makes little sense in this context.
>>> Thanks
>>> Lewis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Tony Mullins <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Lewis , That patch doesn't solve me problem. I need schema for Solr
>>> 4.3.0.
>>> > It doesn''t work when yoou try to do 'browse' in Solr 4.3.0.
>>> >
>>> > Does any one have working Nutch-Solr Schema for Solr 4.3.0 ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Tony.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Tony,
>>> > > Please see
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1486
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Lewis
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Tony Mullins <
>>> [email protected]
>>> > > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Any one has a updated Nutch-Solr Schema for new Solr 4.3 ?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > As the existing Nutch>conf>Solr 4 schema doesn't work with Solr
4.3.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > Tony.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > *Lewis*
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Lewis*
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Lewis
>
>

-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to