I'm piecing together a Homebrew formula for install nutch on Macs. The `ant runtime` build step succeeds, but for some reason, the resulting runtime/ directory isn't kept in the Cellar. Would someone kindly help debug this?
https://gist.github.com/apennebaker/6270993 On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Pennebaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Hmm. Does nutch offer a command line option to specify a configuration > file? That way, you could `nutch -c coolsite.xml && nutch -c > awesomesite.xml`, for example, and you could refer to a single nutch binary > installed globally. > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Nicholas Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I understand >> >> but how will an installer handle the use case which is >> >> "install nutch with multiple configurations for numerous crawls?" >> >> basically, for me anyway, that means multiple installations of nutch via >> ant/ant job >> >> I'm kludging a kind of apache solr multicore for nutch (not very welll I >> suspect) >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Pennebaker <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > A bash script would be a great start! Though systems that depend on >> nutch >> > would want to handle it via a standard package manager, so that's the >> end >> > goal. >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Nicholas Roberts < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > wouldn't a bash script cover mac and linux? >> > > >> > > also, nutch doesn't do multi-core like solr so how do you install many >> > > variations? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Andrew, >> > > > It seems that from the core Nutch team the time and desire is not >> there >> > > > right now to push forward with your proposals. >> > > > This DOES NOT mean that the proposals will be ignored. >> > > > I would FULLY back convenient packaging for Nutch artifacts... it >> would >> > > be >> > > > a really great community contributions and we would be one of the >> few >> > > > Apache projects that actually could claim to have such facets to the >> > > > community. >> > > > Please, feel free to press on with this if you have the time... >> right >> > > now I >> > > > certainly do not. >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Lewis >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Andrew Pennebaker < >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I've built a .deb for Digital Paintball a few years ago ( >> > > > > >> > http://downloads.yellosoft.us/apps/digitalpaintball-debian-src.tar.gz, >> > > > > >> http://downloads.yellosoft.us/apps/digitalpaintball_2.0-19_all.deb). >> > > > > There's a tutorial for doing this: >> > > > > >> > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging >> > > > > >> > > > > However, I'm using nutch for work, and may have an awkward time >> > > charging >> > > > > hours for contributing to nutch. If we could work together to get >> a >> > > .deb, >> > > > > maybe even a PPA repo for Debian/Ubuntu, a Homebrew formula for >> Mac, >> > > and >> > > > a >> > > > > Chocolatey package for Windows, that would make my life, and >> probably >> > > > > thousands of others' lives, a whole lot easier. I'll see what I >> can >> > get >> > > > > done during downtime, probably prioritizing Homebrew first. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Andrew, >> > > > > > Have you written and maintained Debian packages before? >> > > > > > I opened a Jira issue for this a whiel back and as far as I >> know it >> > > is >> > > > a >> > > > > > far from trivial process but I would be very very interested to >> > get a >> > > > > > Debiran package for Nutch and look at a mac package if so >> required. >> > > > > > There is an issue of who is going to maintain these packages? >> > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > lewis >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Friday, August 16, 2013, Andrew Pennebaker < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > I think it would make nutch installation easier if we released >> > > > > > standardized >> > > > > > > packages. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > For example, the Nutch tutorial calls for manually >> downloading a >> > > ZIP, >> > > > > > > extracting the contents, installing ant, compiling nutch with >> > ant, >> > > > and >> > > > > > > adjusting PATH. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > What if instead, Ubuntu users could simply "apt-get install >> > nutch", >> > > > the >> > > > > > > same way you can install wget with "apt-get install wget"? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Similarly, we could help out Mac developers by submitting a >> > > > > > > Homebrew<http://brew.sh/> formula >> > > > > > > for nutch, and Windows developers would enjoy a >> > > > > > > Chocolatey<http://chocolatey.org/> package. >> > > > > > > The easier the installation process, the more people want to >> use >> > > > nutch! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > *Lewis* >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > *Lewis* >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Nicholas Roberts >> > > US 510-684-8264 >> > > http://Permaculture.TV <http://permaculture.tv/> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> Nicholas Roberts >> US 510-684-8264 >> http://Permaculture.TV <http://permaculture.tv/> >> > >
