I suggest that this moves on to the relevant Jira issue. If we want to make Debian or other packages for Nutch then this is certainly a task which we should move to dev@ and Jira. This is great
On Monday, August 19, 2013, Andrew Pennebaker <apenneba...@42six.com> wrote: > I'm piecing together a Homebrew formula for install nutch on Macs. The `ant > runtime` build step succeeds, but for some reason, the resulting runtime/ > directory isn't kept in the Cellar. Would someone kindly help debug this? > > https://gist.github.com/apennebaker/6270993 > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Pennebaker > <apenneba...@42six.com>wrote: > >> Hmm. Does nutch offer a command line option to specify a configuration >> file? That way, you could `nutch -c coolsite.xml && nutch -c >> awesomesite.xml`, for example, and you could refer to a single nutch binary >> installed globally. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Nicholas Roberts < >> niccolo.robe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I understand >>> >>> but how will an installer handle the use case which is >>> >>> "install nutch with multiple configurations for numerous crawls?" >>> >>> basically, for me anyway, that means multiple installations of nutch via >>> ant/ant job >>> >>> I'm kludging a kind of apache solr multicore for nutch (not very welll I >>> suspect) >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Pennebaker < apenneba...@42six.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > A bash script would be a great start! Though systems that depend on >>> nutch >>> > would want to handle it via a standard package manager, so that's the >>> end >>> > goal. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Nicholas Roberts < >>> > niccolo.robe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > wouldn't a bash script cover mac and linux? >>> > > >>> > > also, nutch doesn't do multi-core like solr so how do you install many >>> > > variations? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >>> > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Andrew, >>> > > > It seems that from the core Nutch team the time and desire is not >>> there >>> > > > right now to push forward with your proposals. >>> > > > This DOES NOT mean that the proposals will be ignored. >>> > > > I would FULLY back convenient packaging for Nutch artifacts... it >>> would >>> > > be >>> > > > a really great community contributions and we would be one of the >>> few >>> > > > Apache projects that actually could claim to have such facets to the >>> > > > community. >>> > > > Please, feel free to press on with this if you have the time... >>> right >>> > > now I >>> > > > certainly do not. >>> > > > Thanks >>> > > > Lewis >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Andrew Pennebaker < >>> > > apenneba...@42six.com >>> > > > >wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > I've built a .deb for Digital Paintball a few years ago ( >>> > > > > >>> > http://downloads.yellosoft.us/apps/digitalpaintball-debian-src.tar.gz, >>> > > > > >>> http://downloads.yellosoft.us/apps/digitalpaintball_2.0-19_all.deb). >>> > > > > There's a tutorial for doing this: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging >>> > > > > >>> > > > > However, I'm using nutch for work, and may have an awkward time >>> > > charging >>> > > > > hours for contributing to nutch. If we could work together to get >>> a >>> > > .deb, >>> > > > > maybe even a PPA repo for Debian/Ubuntu, a Homebrew formula for >>> Mac, >>> > > and >>> > > > a >>> > > > > Chocolatey package for Windows, that would make my life, and >>> probably > -- *Lewis*