No, it happened with "yes". I'm using the distribution by the way, didn't build the latest version to check with it.
Dhanush Gopinath wrote: > > Hi, > > Is point 2 below happening when you are using initiate with a value > "join"? I couldn't deploy a process which had correlation set with > initiate as "join", but it worked with initiate as "yes". > > Thanks > Dhanush > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Questions re ODE2.0-beta > > Hi Dawg, > > On 27.01.2010 14:56, dawg wrote: >> 1. The instance management implementation of fault() is empty at the > moment. >> Is there a plan to implement it? > > Since it is part of the API it should be implemented. However AFAIK > nobody is currently working on that. If you'd want to create and submit > a patch, that would be highly appreciated ;) > >> 2. I could not get correlation to work with 2.0. Is there a known > problem >> with it or is the problem local for me only? > > A couple of weeks ago I've fixed an issue related to correlation. Please > see ODE-721, perhaps it's the root cause for your problems, too? > >> 3. Implicit initialisation for variables - this is one of the more > annoying >> side effects of using ODE comparing to other bpel engines. Is there a > plan >> to enhance this behaviour? (I know its part of the bpel spec, but it > makes >> the development of complex processes quite hard as you have to > explicitly >> initialise all variables before you can use them). > > I tend to agree but the problem is that the initialization mechanism > will never be complete as it is impossible to guess if or how many > optional elements/attributes should be placed in the variable. Hence, I > really think this issue should be properly tackled by BPEL designers, > not by the engine itself. However, if someone is willing to provide > concept and implementation for such a feature, I'd be the last one who > would object to incorporate into ODE (as long as it does not break the > standard behavior). > > Best, > Tammo > > -- > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Questions-re-ODE2.0-beta-tp27339464p27439379.html Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
