Thanks Tammo. Re point 1, I definitely need it, but I hoped I'd be able to avoid diving into the internal implementation... I will start looking into it soon, if I something worth contributing, I sure will.
Dawg Tammo van Lessen wrote: > > Hi Dawg, > > On 27.01.2010 14:56, dawg wrote: >> 1. The instance management implementation of fault() is empty at the >> moment. >> Is there a plan to implement it? > > Since it is part of the API it should be implemented. However AFAIK > nobody is currently working on that. If you'd want to create and submit > a patch, that would be highly appreciated ;) > >> 2. I could not get correlation to work with 2.0. Is there a known problem >> with it or is the problem local for me only? > > A couple of weeks ago I've fixed an issue related to correlation. Please > see ODE-721, perhaps it's the root cause for your problems, too? > >> 3. Implicit initialisation for variables - this is one of the more >> annoying >> side effects of using ODE comparing to other bpel engines. Is there a >> plan >> to enhance this behaviour? (I know its part of the bpel spec, but it >> makes >> the development of complex processes quite hard as you have to explicitly >> initialise all variables before you can use them). > > I tend to agree but the problem is that the initialization mechanism > will never be complete as it is impossible to guess if or how many > optional elements/attributes should be placed in the variable. Hence, I > really think this issue should be properly tackled by BPEL designers, > not by the engine itself. However, if someone is willing to provide > concept and implementation for such a feature, I'd be the last one who > would object to incorporate into ODE (as long as it does not break the > standard behavior). > > Best, > Tammo > > -- > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Questions-re-ODE2.0-beta-tp27339464p27439415.html Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
