Florin Jurcovici wrote:
IMO, an open wiki is the right thing to do. Even if I had some
experience which I'd like to share, if the wiki is closed or
restricted, I cannot. Some maintainers should review docs occasionally
and correct or delete them if they are not OK, maybe draw an outline
of the documentation at the beginning then let whoever is willing to
fill the pages. But IMO a closed/restricted wiki is not the way to go.
--Florin Jurcovici
------------------
Why do psychics have to ask you for your name?
I'm inclined to agree. They can't be very psychic can they?
Er... Only joking :) Seriously though... I've had one web site going for
more than 4 years now where you don't have to log in to post any kind of
pictures and text you like with just one click. So far, only one person
has managed to get that far. And what they posted was more funny that
threatening, and easy to delete. No doubt now I've tempted fate by
posting this here some bright spark will track it down and prove me
wrong. But, aside from that, my feeling would be to stay open, look on
the bright side and keep the shutters down until you have reason not to.
But I wouldn't want that to be a deal breaker. If Andrew thinks that's
the way to go then that would be OK with me.
