Andrew,
Good point. I'd forgotten about the dialectic. I'd go for that too. Why
not have both? A synthesis of opposites and a rationalisation between
the two. We both agree it's the way to go. By any means necessary as
they say :)
Ian
Andrew Sykes wrote:
Ian,
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 20:59 +0000, Ian McNulty wrote:
I think it does. Socratic dialogue... Arguing things through and
balancing the ratio of points for and against is the only way to
discover the rational way forward and what might be able to fly.
Well, I like to think of it as a dialectic process, but sure, it's the
way to go!
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mcnultyMEDIA
60 Birkdale Gardens
Durham
DH1 2UL
t: +44 (0)191 384 4736
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.mcnultymedia.co.uk
==============================================================================================
This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) named
above and is confidential. Any form of distribution, copying, discussion or use
of this communication, its contents, or any information contained herein
without prior consent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication
in error, please notify the sender by email or by telephone on +44 (0)191 384
4736
This email has been checked for viruses, however, we cannot accept any
liability sustained as a result of software viruses and would recommend that
you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
==============================================================================================
