It depends what kind of business you are in and where you put the value of
"instant messaging" I guess. In my business the customer is king. Sales reps
might be on the phone and we can still feed them info as it arrives. We can
interrupt them to let them know about important phone calls. We can
collaborate on projects even when we are outside the office just by virtue
of being logged in.

There are endless reasons but it depends on what you see as the future of
ofbiz. I would really like to see my entire business run from one app. One
user, one app and all from a browser. That’s my ideal situation and chat
could go a long way in accomplishing that.




David E. Jones-2 wrote:
> 
> 
> Not much.
> 
> What would it even mean to integrate text chat with OFBiz?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott A wrote:
> 
>>
>> That's why the license would be so important. What does David have  
>> to say?
>>
>>
>> Walter Vaughan wrote:
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, I would recommend Jabber too.
>>>
>>> http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2006/10/05/instant-messaging-for- 
>>> jabber-with-smack.html
>>> The SmackAPI according to the article is Apache licensed. IANAL,  
>>> etc.....
>>>
>>> This looks like this an interesting add on. Would be insanely  
>>> powerful to
>>> add it
>>> into the ecommerce modules with perhaps some sort of ACD backend.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Walter
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Chat-Modules- 
>> tf3631776.html#a10146317
>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
> 
> 
>  
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Chat-Modules-tf3631776.html#a10147641
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to