I don't really like the idea of "primary role", as roles don't really
work that way.
If you don't want a party showing up on a list of leads and contacts,
then they shouldn't have both the lead and contact roles...
Could you be more specific about what you're trying to do here?
-David
On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Why not make it a party relationship? A party is related to this
party/company/etc as a lead/contact/account/etc.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 6/5/08, Hans Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From: Hans Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: primary Role on party
To: "user" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, June 5, 2008, 8:08 PM
In the SFA application I need the definition of a 'primary roleType'
to
identify where a party is listed...either in leads, contacts or
accounts...
Anybody any objections when i add this field to the Party entity?
Regards,
Hans
