Sorry, what was that? You "thought you had it down"? Now I'm confused.
I commented on this because you started your email by saying that you didn't have it down: "someone else my correct me, but ofbiz has a basic system. you can look at the data model book for manufacturing. there may be some coding that needs to be done." My interpretation of what you wrote, in the same order, is roughly: "I'm not sure what I'm talking about, but I think the stuff in OFBiz is pretty basic. Look in the Data Model Resource Book for more information on manufacturing because I don't really know. Even though I don't know if OFBiz supports this or not, I do know that if it doesn't then some coding may be needed." That may be a big misinterpretation, but if it's not too far off the mark then what you do you mean by "thought I had it down"? -David On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:23:59 -0700, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guess I need to do more reading. > thought I had it down. > :) > > David Jones sent the following on 7/22/2008 11:00 AM: >> Hey BJ: I know you're trying to help, and you often do, but if you don't > know why guess? You risk either spreading FUD about OFBiz or leading > someone in the wrong direction. >> >> On this topic, personally I would even prefer to defer to Jacopo to > comment. >> >> -David >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:51:01 -0700, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>> someone else my correct me, but ofbiz has a basic system. >>> you can look at the data model book for manufacturing. >>> there may be some coding that needs to be done. >>> I am hoping that the project module can be tied into manufacturing so >>> the you can have Gnatt and Pert charts to evaluate processes and when >>> they can be done >>> this would then allow for parallel processes. >>> >>> brijesh m sent the following on 7/22/2008 10:42 AM: >>>> Hi friends, >>>> I am trying to configure the below routing having routing tasks >>> A,B,C,D,E and then finished product got produced. >>>> A------>B----->D----->F---->Finished Product >>>> | ^ >>>> |------>C----->E--------| >>>> >>>> Actually my main aim is to explore how OFBiz handles the parallel >>> processes which are very much the case in manufacturing units. I have >>> tried some tricks but didn't able to get it. The thing is that in > routing >>> you can't add two routing task with same sequence number which > restrains >>> the below routing scenario. Please have a look at it and suggest the >>> solution I am sure many among us have encountered this issue at some > point >>> of time. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Brijesh M >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >>
