actually I used that because I was also proposing something, and it was a polite way of leaving the door open. but your criticism is accepted.
David Jones sent the following on 7/22/2008 11:33 AM: > Sorry, what was that? You "thought you had it down"? Now I'm confused. > > I commented on this because you started your email by saying that you didn't > have it down: "someone else my correct me, but ofbiz has a basic system. you > can look at the data model book for manufacturing. there may be some coding > that needs to be done." > > My interpretation of what you wrote, in the same order, is roughly: "I'm not > sure what I'm talking about, but I think the stuff in OFBiz is pretty basic. > Look in the Data Model Resource Book for more information on manufacturing > because I don't really know. Even though I don't know if OFBiz supports this > or not, I do know that if it doesn't then some coding may be needed." > > That may be a big misinterpretation, but if it's not too far off the mark > then what you do you mean by "thought I had it down"? > > -David > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:23:59 -0700, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Guess I need to do more reading. >> thought I had it down. >> :) >> >> David Jones sent the following on 7/22/2008 11:00 AM: >>> Hey BJ: I know you're trying to help, and you often do, but if you don't >> know why guess? You risk either spreading FUD about OFBiz or leading >> someone in the wrong direction. >>> On this topic, personally I would even prefer to defer to Jacopo to >> comment. >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:51:01 -0700, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>> someone else my correct me, but ofbiz has a basic system. >>>> you can look at the data model book for manufacturing. >>>> there may be some coding that needs to be done. >>>> I am hoping that the project module can be tied into manufacturing so >>>> the you can have Gnatt and Pert charts to evaluate processes and when >>>> they can be done >>>> this would then allow for parallel processes. >>>> >>>> brijesh m sent the following on 7/22/2008 10:42 AM: >>>>> Hi friends, >>>>> I am trying to configure the below routing having routing tasks >>>> A,B,C,D,E and then finished product got produced. >>>>> A------>B----->D----->F---->Finished Product >>>>> | ^ >>>>> |------>C----->E--------| >>>>> >>>>> Actually my main aim is to explore how OFBiz handles the parallel >>>> processes which are very much the case in manufacturing units. I have >>>> tried some tricks but didn't able to get it. The thing is that in >> routing >>>> you can't add two routing task with same sequence number which >> restrains >>>> the below routing scenario. Please have a look at it and suggest the >>>> solution I am sure many among us have encountered this issue at some >> point >>>> of time. >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Brijesh M >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >
