Yes, I'd like to commit at least all about the layered lookups
Jacques
From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]>
JIRA says we have this in progress:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310500&status=3
I guess there is more.
I have created the "Release Candidate Branch 10.04" version in JIRA.
We could schedule issues/tasks we want to include in the relase to this JIRA
version so that we all have a clear idea (and may be we could help).
-Bruno
2010/3/14 Anil Patel <[email protected]>
Hi,
We are approaching 10.04 date range.
How is everybody feeling?
Are we up for new release branch?
Are we interested in completing some code changes before creating release
branch? I mean if somebody has definite plans then it will not hurt to wait
a bit.
I will love to see release branch created towards end of March or beginning
of April.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> I think that we are all close to the same idea.
>
> Only a little bit is missing:
> what we call now "Release branch" should be renamed to "Release
> Candidate branch".
> This would mean that what is contained in that branch is somewhat that
> is going through the release process (testing, bug fixing,
> documenting, etc.) and so it is candidate to become a Release.
>
> When we are happy with the tests done on the RC branch we will tag the
> branch and create the real Release.
> The bug fixing on the RC branch can continue and when we rae happy
> again we can tag it again.
>
> What is the issue on doing this?
> Isn't it the standard way to handle releases?
>
> About releases, branches and tags names:
> I propose to use a name as "RC_10.4" for the next release candidate
branch.
> After a while when no major issues will reported on this branch the
> release can be done that is the "OFBIZ_10.4" tag can be done on the RC
> branch.
> After some bug fixes on the RC_10.4 branch we will tag it again as
> "OFBIZ_10.4.1", "OFBIZ_10.4.2", etc.
> The third number will mean that the release is actually a "mantained",
> "bug fixed", release of the 10.4.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> -Bruno
>
>
> 2010/2/24 Matt Warnock <[email protected]>:
>> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:22 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> Are you planning to fix them or to donate some resources (developers
and/or money) in order to fix them? Or are you asking other to do this?
>>> BTW, do you really think that commercial or open source releases are
done when companies think there are no bugs? Really?
>>
>> Well in my experience it is unusual for most software, and it isn't
>> often in Debian (once about 4 years between releases), but yes, that is
>> EXACTLY when a new Debian Stable is released. :)
>>
>> --
>> Matt Warnock <[email protected]>
>> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.
>>
>>
