Oh I was joking about the "made it up", I wasn't actually trying to imply that 
I made that website, in case it came across that way.

Regards
Scott

On 1/05/2010, at 1:53 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

> So you did!
> Thanks. I didn't know that site existed.
> Regards,
> Ruth
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
> [email protected]
> 
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> I made it up.
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html#ofbiz.apache.org
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 1/05/2010, at 1:31 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>> 
>>  
>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>    
>>>> On 1/05/2010, at 12:53 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Hi Scott:
>>>>> How so?
>>>>>           
>>>> How so what?
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> I have useful information concerning how OFBiz works and I want to share 
>>>>> that with all interested parties.
>>>>>           
>>>> Every time you send this out, over 500 people have to deal with an email 
>>>> that contains no information other than a link to a paid product.  Hardly 
>>>> in keeping with the spirit of an open source mailing list.  Like I said, 
>>>> share some knowledge and then advertise, that way everybody benefits.
>>>>       
>>> Really? 500? Where did you come up with that number?
>>>    
>>>>       
>>>>> Are you now the OFBiz information censor?
>>>>>           
>>>> Hardly, I'm just a fellow user of this mailing list voicing my concern.
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ruth
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is bordering on spam and starting to get annoying, would you mind 
>>>>>> trying to contribute to the discussion before starting in with the 
>>>>>> advertising?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 1/05/2010, at 12:31 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                
>>>>>>> Hello List:
>>>>>>> If anyone is interested in a more in-depth treatment of the Catalog 
>>>>>>> Manager, products, catalogs and categories, please see my book: 
>>>>>>> "Getting Started with Apache OFBiz, The Catalog Manager". You may 
>>>>>>> purchase a copy of this at: http://www.myofbiz.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Paul Abernathy wrote:
>>>>>>>                      
>>>>>>>> BJ,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I also am new to ofbiz and am trying to learn how to use it.  I 
>>>>>>>> couldn't help noticing this discussion because I wanted to do the same 
>>>>>>>> thing - set up a hierarchy of categories for products.  I was just 
>>>>>>>> going through the business setup guide located at 
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Apache+OFBiz+Business+Setup+Guide
>>>>>>>>  and towards the end it discusses how to set up categories.  I have a 
>>>>>>>> couple of questions:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Can a category be used in more than one Catalog?
>>>>>>>> -Can a category have more than one parent?  It looks like the answer 
>>>>>>>> is "no" but just making sure.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>>>                            
>>>>>>>>> are you sure you are not referring to 1 million products.
>>>>>>>>> I run in the real world over 100,000 products.
>>>>>>>>> I have approx 18 top categories with 3-10 levels of sub categories.
>>>>>>>>> if your see 1,000,000 categories that way then it is feasible.
>>>>>>>>> I use automated updating from my suppliers to keep thing up-to-date.
>>>>>>>>> these updates happen every 24 for prices new and obsolete products.
>>>>>>>>> availability is as often as 15 min.
>>>>>>>>> The average Cpu usage during these operations is about 15% of a 1.6ghz
>>>>>>>>> Cpu with enough RAM to not use the swap file. the peak cpu usage is
>>>>>>>>> about 75% when the scheduled services and large imports (1 gig data) 
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> happening.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman
>>>>>>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>>>>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation 
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>>>>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>>>>>>>> Linkedin
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>>>>>>>>  Michal Cukierman sent the following on 4/30/2010 1:51 AM:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                                  
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your quick response. Regarding your question about 
>>>>>>>>>> real world
>>>>>>>>>> applications:
>>>>>>>>>> Ecommerce:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rockauto.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://allegro.pl/
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> There are applications that holds > 1 000 000 categories.
>>>>>>>>>> In a PLM industry it's also very common to have a couple of milions 
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> objects (consider the complexity of a train or a plain for example).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The point of my post was not a fix, but the implementation of  the 
>>>>>>>>>> find root
>>>>>>>>>> category method.
>>>>>>>>>> I think that you should avoid such a code. You have got great 
>>>>>>>>>> database layer
>>>>>>>>>> (great possibility to improve performance)  so it would be great to 
>>>>>>>>>> utilize
>>>>>>>>>> it as much as it's possible.
>>>>>>>>>> I really like Ofbiz application thats why I try to give you my input.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Once again thank you for the response and for the link you send me. 
>>>>>>>>>> I will
>>>>>>>>>> come back with the better solution after studing  the datamodel.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Micha³ Cukierman
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 30 kwietnia 2010 10:11 u¿ytkownik Jacques Le Roux <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> napisa³:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>                                          
>>>>>>>>>>> For instanc
>>>>>>>>>>>                                                   
>>>>>>>>>                                   
>>>>>>>>                            
>>>>>>                
>>>>       
>> 
>>  

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to