Heidi, I'm not out to get Ruth and I'm glad that new users have another source of information available.
Please re-read what I've said, there are lots of ways to let people know about her site and I was simply trying to communicate that I thought it could be done in a better way. Regards Scott On 1/05/2010, at 1:47 AM, Info Olagos wrote: > Hello, > > I think it is a must that we have also the information available from > www.myofbiz.com. For me it is very useful and not commercial if you let only > pay a little bit to pay the hosting costs. > > The quality of the material is very high and a must for every ofbiz user. > > So i don't see why this information may not be made public as there are also > the ofbiz books listed under the "books" title at the front page of > ofbiz.apache.org . > > I hope for the knowledge of every ofbiz user that these > www.myofbiz.comuserguides still maintain available in the future. > > Regards, > Heidi > > > > 2010/4/30 Scott Gray <[email protected]> > >> I made it up. >> >> http://people.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html#ofbiz.apache.org >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 1/05/2010, at 1:31 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> On 1/05/2010, at 12:53 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Scott: >>>>> How so? >>>>> >>>> >>>> How so what? >>>> >>>> >>>>> I have useful information concerning how OFBiz works and I want to >> share that with all interested parties. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Every time you send this out, over 500 people have to deal with an email >> that contains no information other than a link to a paid product. Hardly in >> keeping with the spirit of an open source mailing list. Like I said, share >> some knowledge and then advertise, that way everybody benefits. >>>> >>> Really? 500? Where did you come up with that number? >>>> >>>>> Are you now the OFBiz information censor? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hardly, I'm just a fellow user of this mailing list voicing my concern. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ruth >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword >> "myofbiz" >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is bordering on spam and starting to get annoying, would you mind >> trying to contribute to the discussion before starting in with the >> advertising? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/05/2010, at 12:31 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello List: >>>>>>> If anyone is interested in a more in-depth treatment of the Catalog >> Manager, products, catalogs and categories, please see my book: "Getting >> Started with Apache OFBiz, The Catalog Manager". You may purchase a copy of >> this at: http://www.myofbiz.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword >> "myofbiz" >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Abernathy wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also am new to ofbiz and am trying to learn how to use it. I >> couldn't help noticing this discussion because I wanted to do the same thing >> - set up a hierarchy of categories for products. I was just going through >> the business setup guide located at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Apache+OFBiz+Business+Setup+Guideand >> towards the end it discusses how to set up categories. I have a couple >> of questions: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Can a category be used in more than one Catalog? >>>>>>>> -Can a category have more than one parent? It looks like the answer >> is "no" but just making sure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> are you sure you are not referring to 1 million products. >>>>>>>>> I run in the real world over 100,000 products. >>>>>>>>> I have approx 18 top categories with 3-10 levels of sub categories. >>>>>>>>> if your see 1,000,000 categories that way then it is feasible. >>>>>>>>> I use automated updating from my suppliers to keep thing >> up-to-date. >>>>>>>>> these updates happen every 24 for prices new and obsolete products. >>>>>>>>> availability is as often as 15 min. >>>>>>>>> The average Cpu usage during these operations is about 15% of a >> 1.6ghz >>>>>>>>> Cpu with enough RAM to not use the swap file. the peak cpu usage is >>>>>>>>> about 75% when the scheduled services and large imports (1 gig >> data) are >>>>>>>>> happening. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ========================= >>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>>>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < >> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>>>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>>>>> Linkedin >>>>>>>>> < >> http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro >>> >>>>>>>>> Michal Cukierman sent the following on 4/30/2010 1:51 AM: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your quick response. Regarding your question about >> real world >>>>>>>>>> applications: >>>>>>>>>> Ecommerce: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.rockauto.com/ >>>>>>>>>> http://allegro.pl/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There are applications that holds > 1 000 000 categories. >>>>>>>>>> In a PLM industry it's also very common to have a couple of >> milions of >>>>>>>>>> objects (consider the complexity of a train or a plain for >> example). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The point of my post was not a fix, but the implementation of the >> find root >>>>>>>>>> category method. >>>>>>>>>> I think that you should avoid such a code. You have got great >> database layer >>>>>>>>>> (great possibility to improve performance) so it would be great >> to utilize >>>>>>>>>> it as much as it's possible. >>>>>>>>>> I really like Ofbiz application thats why I try to give you my >> input. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Once again thank you for the response and for the link you send >> me. I will >>>>>>>>>> come back with the better solution after studing the datamodel. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Micha³ Cukierman >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 30 kwietnia 2010 10:11 u¿ytkownik Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> napisa³: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For instanc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
