Each release is only as good as the community makes it.  Community is the key 
word here, nobody gets paid to make sure Mike Z is downloading a bug free 
release.

My guess is that most implementations have chosen not to allow customer's to 
cancel their orders and hence the bug doesn't concern them.  If it concerns you 
then download the patch, test it, report the results and eventually a committer 
will find some spare time to look at it and possibly commit it.

What else?  Possibly plenty else.  You can view the reported unresolved bugs by 
release in jira and you'll also need to be open to the possibility that there 
are other unreported bugs.

It is up to users of the release like yourself to test the features that you 
need working and if they aren't then report them.  Like I said, the release is 
only as good as the community makes it.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 15/07/2010, at 4:55 AM, Mike Z wrote:

> I'm testing my new store, when I decide to login as a user and cancel
> an order (which is suppose to work).  The user sees this:
> 
> The Following Errors Occurred:
> Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
> Service invocation error (Could not commit transaction for service
> [cancelOrderItem] call: Roll back error, could not commit transaction,
> was rolled back instead because of: Error in simple-method [Auto
> create OrderAdjustments
> [file:/opt/ofbiz-9.04/applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/order/OrderServices.xml#recreateOrderAdjustments]]:
> ; [Security Error To Run Auto Create Order Adjustments])
> 
> Odd.  Looking further, I discover that a bug was submitted back in
> OCT09, priority MAJOR, with a patch, and verified:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3075
> 
> Why wasn't it fixed in 9.04 SVN?  I'm sorry, but as a brand new user,
> the reason I chose 9.04 is because it is suppose to be the golden
> build, patched as required, rock solid.  All new users are directed to
> 9.04.
> 
> The bug actually exposes my INTERNAL paths!
> 
> So I have to ask.  What else????

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to