Thanks BJ. I hope it was just an oversight. 9.04 seems pretty rock solid otherwise. Even so, starting a local repository is probably the way to go, because I'll surely be tweaking it as I learn more.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > I appreciate you input and reminder. > remember this is not a paid organization but volunteers. > and things do slip by. > the PMC have instituted a few months ago the status patch ready to help > inform committers so such slip ups are found > > Also any Branch release is for the best part bug free, but that depends on > the testing done by users and submittion jiras. In all fairness there have > been a lot of bug fixes on 9.04. even so the testing is not the level you > have been use to in a Paid Corporation, where you have a room full of > machines with different configuration and a team of paid testers to put it > though it paces. > > Ofbiz, at best, is a semi complete application that has room for improvement > and completion of features. > to Start using Ofbiz as a complete application like say Word or Open office > is a mistake. > > > > > Mike Z sent the following on 7/14/2010 9:55 AM: >> >> I'm testing my new store, when I decide to login as a user and cancel >> an order (which is suppose to work). The user sees this: >> >> The Following Errors Occurred: >> Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: >> Service invocation error (Could not commit transaction for service >> [cancelOrderItem] call: Roll back error, could not commit transaction, >> was rolled back instead because of: Error in simple-method [Auto >> create OrderAdjustments >> >> [file:/opt/ofbiz-9.04/applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/order/OrderServices.xml#recreateOrderAdjustments]]: >> ; [Security Error To Run Auto Create Order Adjustments]) >> >> Odd. Looking further, I discover that a bug was submitted back in >> OCT09, priority MAJOR, with a patch, and verified: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3075 >> >> Why wasn't it fixed in 9.04 SVN? I'm sorry, but as a brand new user, >> the reason I chose 9.04 is because it is suppose to be the golden >> build, patched as required, rock solid. All new users are directed to >> 9.04. >> >> The bug actually exposes my INTERNAL paths! >> >> So I have to ask. What else???? >> >
