I was reffering to this:
On 07/29/2010 01:53 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I guess the basic questions might be: Did we have an official "freeze"
> process where we only accepted bug fixes against that branch? Do we have
> any open bugs that are considered "release critical"?
I agree. At least *all* bugs should be looked at, and given a target
release tag, etc. Time for some bug triage. I don't think there has
been a concerted effort like that in like, forever.
I have not seen anything that shows this as taken care of.
Have I missed something?
=========================
BJ Freeman <http://bjfreeman.elance.com>
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
David E Jones sent the following on 8/30/2010 9:47 PM:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:38 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
There are a number of bugs that have to be resolved before release
remember this is a volunteer effort so there is no full time person doing the
patches for the bugs.
What are you basing this on?
once they are completed and testing has been done then there will be a release.
right now we are about 4 months past the planned release date.
What are you basing this on? Maybe there is some confusion... the date on a
release is the date it was branched from the trunk, not the date that a binary
release is done from the branch.
-David
Matt Warnock sent the following on 8/30/2010 9:27 PM:
Thanks. Is 10.04 nearing release? Is there an expected release date?
Just curious.
