Hi Jacques, I thought you fixed OFBIZ-3837 recently? Or was that some other shipping estimate problem you were working on?
Regards Scott On 31/08/2010, at 7:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > There are currently 275 UNRESOLVED bugs, 11 have patches available, 14 are > reopened. > This is againt all versions. There are only 78 for trunk but this is not a > reliable criteria (if any are) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3837 is marked as blocking. But I > guess not under Scott's criteria (it's not blocking OFBiz, just blocking a > part of it, so it's critical actually) > 4 are critical and 173 major > > No needs to say that any help to clean things would be really appreciated... > > HTH > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[email protected]> >> Quick scan of Jira shows 4 open bugs not counting mine. >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman <http://bjfreeman.elance.com> >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >> >> BJ Freeman sent the following on 8/30/2010 10:17 PM: >>> Actually I meant a response to it like there are no bugs that fit this >>> condition. >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman <http://bjfreeman.elance.com> >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>> >>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>> >>> Scott Gray sent the following on 8/30/2010 10:12 PM: >>> >>> >>>> You missed something by reading an email from a community member and >>>> interpreting it's contents as some sort of official policy. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 31/08/2010, at 5:07 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> >>>>> I was reffering to this: >>>>> On 07/29/2010 01:53 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote: >>>>>> I guess the basic questions might be: Did we have an official "freeze" >>>>>> process where we only accepted bug fixes against that branch? Do we >>>>>> have >>>>>> any open bugs that are considered "release critical"? >>>>> >>>>> I agree. At least *all* bugs should be looked at, and given a target >>>>> release tag, etc. Time for some bug triage. I don't think there has >>>>> been a concerted effort like that in like, forever. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have not seen anything that shows this as taken care of. >>>>> Have I missed something? >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> BJ Freeman<http://bjfreeman.elance.com> >>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier >>>>> Automation<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>> >>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>> >>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 8/30/2010 9:47 PM: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:38 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There are a number of bugs that have to be resolved before release >>>>>>> remember this is a volunteer effort so there is no full time person >>>>>>> doing the patches for the bugs. >>>>>> >>>>>> What are you basing this on? >>>>>> >>>>>>> once they are completed and testing has been done then there will >>>>>>> be a release. >>>>>>> right now we are about 4 months past the planned release date. >>>>>> >>>>>> What are you basing this on? Maybe there is some confusion... the >>>>>> date on a release is the date it was branched from the trunk, not >>>>>> the date that a binary release is done from the branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt Warnock sent the following on 8/30/2010 9:27 PM: >>>>>>>> Thanks. Is 10.04 nearing release? Is there an expected release date? >>>>>>>> Just curious. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
