Hi Eric, every image is defined by a contentId/dataresource/image to which attributes: 'ContentAttribrutes' can be added....
Regards, Hans -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:38 +0100, eric wrote: > Hi Hans, > > To manage my images, I need to attach an attribute to each image > Ex : image has a "Background", image is a "Collection" of product ... , > what features my image is composed ... > > (Fabiance web site works with OFBiz) > See the first image of the slide show, "Canapé HOME SPIRIT ... Chicago" > http://www.fabiance.fr/ > And now the "Chicago" product detail : > http://www.fabiance.fr/canape-tissu-home-spirit-silver/chicago > The presentation image with "Background" is in fifth position. > > Another example with a category "POUF" : http://www.fabiance.fr/pouf > For the product "MACAO", "Pouf" image is the last image : > http://www.fabiance.fr/canape-tissu-home-spirit-silver/macao > > How can I select images without attribute ? > > Eric > > > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:54 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 19:39 -0800, rohit wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > i am also not sure of a few other practical issues. for eg. bulk uploading > > > of new products and images. currently i assume most use the the xml file > > > to > > > import products data and then upload product images into 1 directory after > > > re-sizing. though it appears that the existing image file system can be > > > maintained, but does it make sense to have 2 different image file system, > > > it > > > can obviously be an issue when doing back-up maintenance etc. > > > > resizing can now be done by the image management system. > > > > > > > > The new image management contribution, does not seem complete as its not > > > working fully on the demo server, when i checked last 03/09/11. > > > > > > > Let me know what is not working by raising a jira issue. We plan to > > provide more information on the image management system in the next few > > weeks. > > > > > Also there are many store which run ofbiz on the trunk. though the trunk > > > may > > > not be ideal for it, i still believe that the current structure should not > > > have been removed so fast as many using ofbiz risk accidently deleting all > > > their images. And instead of replacing the current directory structure a > > > new > > > directly may have used until the code matured and acquired more > > > acceptance. > > > > > > > There was an jira issue on this which was open for 10 days before > > committing. > > > > > Should it not be researched more, before it replaces t > > > he current structure. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Rohit > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > saanjhi.com > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1076507-deletes-the-images-folder-tp3343463p3347403.html > > > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > You might consider following the OFBiz mailing list directly, so you are > > better informed. > > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
