I like the idea and have already suggested
http://markmail.org/message/rrre2cslfou32vnp
http://markmail.org/message/7wzti5asolef5njz)
Also I tend to agree with Ruth: the difficulties is to categorize features before, I begin in French long time ago, never ended...
other priorities came along...
http://www.les7arts.com/assist/OFBiz/Principales%20Caracteristiques%20Fonctionnelles.htm
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[email protected]>
Hi Hans:
IMHO, you would just be adding to the confusion. How does someone know if they are a beginner? And, what are the basic features in
each component? Who decides basic vs. full featured?
On the other hand, now that I'm thinking about it, maybe this is a good idea. In the process of deciding what is basic and what is
"full featured" you will need to do some documenting. At a minimum you will need to record functional capabilities on a component
by component level. A much needed addition to the OFBiz community if you ask me!
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth
On 4/25/11 11:50 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
In general it is accepted that OFBiz is having too much functionality
which can be really overwhelming.
We are thinking about introducing a user preference in function levels:
for example:
1. beginner
2. intermediate
3. full feature.
The beginner will only see the basic features in the components however
the system will be fully functional.
The intermediate person will see more functions but not everything..
And the full feature will show everything what is there.
Anybody any opinions or thoughts about this?
Regards,
Hans
