Thanks Adrian.
IMO, that needed to be said by an insider.
Regards,
Ruth
On 4/26/11 10:20 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The problem with the Party component isn't that it's too advanced for
a beginning user. The problem is it is poorly designed, or has no
design at all. The Party component has become a dumping ground for all
kinds of things that don't belong there. Not only does that make it
hard to use, it also makes it dependent on every other component in
the project.
-Adrian
On 4/25/2011 11:27 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I agree, this function is not so suitable for the order and facility
components.
I was however thinking of the product and party component. These are far
to big for the starting user and here it could be a big advantage to
show only a limited functionality....
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 22:57 -0700, David E Jones wrote:
Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking too. If only we had the
Moqui style authorization stuff in OFBiz... ;)
-David
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
This is starting to sound to me like user permissions that can be
customised to show or hide functions? Then it can be customised if
a organisation wants to or left default.
Rather than beginner, intermediate and full it would be role based
e.g. Warehouse Picker, Warehouse Packer, PO Creator, PO Approver,
Product Manager etc.
Sam
On 26 Apr 2011, at 02:09, David E Jones wrote:
Is it even possible to have a single decision about what would go
in each level, or would this tend to vary in different user
organizations?
If this were something configurable would it need to be on a
screen level, on a form field level, or something even more detailed?
-David
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I like the idea and have already suggested
http://markmail.org/message/rrre2cslfou32vnp
http://markmail.org/message/7wzti5asolef5njz)
Also I tend to agree with Ruth: the difficulties is to categorize
features before, I begin in French long time ago, never ended...
other priorities came along...
http://www.les7arts.com/assist/OFBiz/Principales%20Caracteristiques%20Fonctionnelles.htm
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"<[email protected]>
Hi Hans:
IMHO, you would just be adding to the confusion. How does
someone know if they are a beginner? And, what are the basic
features in each component? Who decides basic vs. full featured?
On the other hand, now that I'm thinking about it, maybe this is
a good idea. In the process of deciding what is basic and what
is "full featured" you will need to do some documenting. At a
minimum you will need to record functional capabilities on a
component by component level. A much needed addition to the
OFBiz community if you ask me!
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth
On 4/25/11 11:50 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
In general it is accepted that OFBiz is having too much
functionality
which can be really overwhelming.
We are thinking about introducing a user preference in function
levels:
for example:
1. beginner
2. intermediate
3. full feature.
The beginner will only see the basic features in the components
however
the system will be fully functional.
The intermediate person will see more functions but not
everything..
And the full feature will show everything what is there.
Anybody any opinions or thoughts about this?
Regards,
Hans
