We are using this and this function should not be deleted quickly....

Regards,
Hans


On 02/23/2012 11:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Good day everyone,

I would love to know from the persons that are using the seleniumxml 
integration available in framework/testools their opinion about this tools; 
specifically I am interested to know:

1) how you use it (settings, platform, browser) and if it is functional and 
useful
2) the advantages you see in using this OFBiz specific integration rather than 
using the standard Selenium tools
** do you find it easier to setup this component rather than the standard 
Selenium?
** is it easier to write tests in the custom xml syntax provided by 
seleniumxml? or do you rather create them (as suggested by the documentation in 
framework/testools) using one of the standard browser plugins available for 
Selenium and then convert to xml using the custom script in OFBiz?
3) are you willing to contribute the tests you are using? are they generic 
enough to be contributed back to the project?

I am asking #1 and #2 because I feel that we could replace all the custom code 
we have for seleniumxml (and required jar files) with a good document that 
explains how to setup Selenium (no special integration is actually required for 
ofbiz) and then, instead of writing/maintaining test scripts in this custom xml 
formal, we could simply accept and commit standard selenium test scripts (in my 
opinion users will be facilitated to contribute them without the need to learn 
a new syntax); we could also provide an ant script to run all of them. In this 
way we could also use a more recent version of Selenium (web driver).

Thanks for your time,

Jacopo


Reply via email to