Hi Hans,

interesting; I would love if you could add some details:
* how do you create seleniumxml tests? do you create them manually (editing xml 
files) or with some other mechanism (Selenium IDE etc...)?
* do you have a big library of test scripts?
* did you try the new version of Selenium?

And last question: when you say "we are using it" what do you mean? You and 
your development team?

Thanks,

Jacopo

On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> We are using this and this function should not be deleted quickly....
> 
> Regards,
> Hans
> 
> 
> On 02/23/2012 11:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Good day everyone,
>> 
>> I would love to know from the persons that are using the seleniumxml 
>> integration available in framework/testools their opinion about this tools; 
>> specifically I am interested to know:
>> 
>> 1) how you use it (settings, platform, browser) and if it is functional and 
>> useful
>> 2) the advantages you see in using this OFBiz specific integration rather 
>> than using the standard Selenium tools
>> ** do you find it easier to setup this component rather than the standard 
>> Selenium?
>> ** is it easier to write tests in the custom xml syntax provided by 
>> seleniumxml? or do you rather create them (as suggested by the documentation 
>> in framework/testools) using one of the standard browser plugins available 
>> for Selenium and then convert to xml using the custom script in OFBiz?
>> 3) are you willing to contribute the tests you are using? are they generic 
>> enough to be contributed back to the project?
>> 
>> I am asking #1 and #2 because I feel that we could replace all the custom 
>> code we have for seleniumxml (and required jar files) with a good document 
>> that explains how to setup Selenium (no special integration is actually 
>> required for ofbiz) and then, instead of writing/maintaining test scripts in 
>> this custom xml formal, we could simply accept and commit standard selenium 
>> test scripts (in my opinion users will be facilitated to contribute them 
>> without the need to learn a new syntax); we could also provide an ant script 
>> to run all of them. In this way we could also use a more recent version of 
>> Selenium (web driver).
>> 
>> Thanks for your time,
>> 
>> Jacopo
>> 
> 

Reply via email to