In a manufacturing setup, one cannot setup WIP as finished goods. I guess, we'll just have to modify the behavior a bit to create Pending Internal Requirements after taking into account existing stock. Do you think it will break something critical?
--Venkat On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < [email protected]> wrote: > WIP materials required by a production run are not picked from warehouse > and WIP materials created by production runs are not sent to warehouse; > they are intended to stay on the manufacturing plant and are used to track > materials created by a production run and used by another one (without > passing for the warehouse). > If you don't want this behaviour you should use standard products > (finished goods or raw materials) > > Jacopo > > On May 14, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote: > > > OTOH, for WIP products, why does it not account for available stock when > > creating Pending Internal requirements? Is there a setting for this? > > > > --Venkat > > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Venkat Mangudi <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Jacopo, > >> > >> I think I found the offensive setting. Product Id 123`15 seems to be a > >> WIP, while 12811 is setup as a Raw Material. But would that cause a > problem? > >> > >> --Venkat > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Venkat Mangudi < > [email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> Let me also look at those two... Quick question though, if I set > minimum > >>> qty to 0, is that a problem? > >>> > >>> Venkat > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Venkat, > >>>> > >>>> what is the content of the ProductFacility and SupplierProduct records > >>>> associated to the productId and facilityId of the MRP? > >>>> > >>>> Jacopo > >>>> > >>>> On May 14, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> We have run into a funny problem running MRP. If I have 100 qty in > >>>> stock > >>>>> and a sales order for 200, MRP generates a manufacturing order for > 200 > >>>> and > >>>>> not 100. Any idea why this is so? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Venkat > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> Venkat > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Venkat > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Venkat > > -- Regards, Venkat
