On May 14, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:

> In a manufacturing setup, one cannot setup WIP as finished goods.

Did you consider to use for them the SUBASSEMBLY type rather than the WIP type?

Jacopo


> I guess,
> we'll just have to modify the behavior a bit to create Pending Internal
> Requirements after taking into account existing stock. Do you think it will
> break something critical?
> 
> --Venkat
> 
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> WIP materials required by a production run are not picked from warehouse
>> and WIP materials created by production runs are not sent to warehouse;
>> they are intended to stay on the manufacturing plant and are used to track
>> materials created by a production run and used by another one (without
>> passing for the warehouse).
>> If you don't want this behaviour you should use standard products
>> (finished goods or raw materials)
>> 
>> Jacopo
>> 
>> On May 14, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
>> 
>>> OTOH, for WIP products, why does it not account for available stock when
>>> creating Pending Internal requirements? Is there a setting for this?
>>> 
>>> --Venkat
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Venkat Mangudi <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Jacopo,
>>>> 
>>>> I think I found the offensive setting. Product Id 123`15 seems to be a
>>>> WIP, while 12811 is setup as a Raw Material. But would that cause a
>> problem?
>>>> 
>>>> --Venkat
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Venkat Mangudi <
>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Let me also look at those two... Quick question though, if I set
>> minimum
>>>>> qty to 0, is that a problem?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Venkat
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Venkat,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> what is the content of the ProductFacility and SupplierProduct records
>>>>>> associated to the productId and facilityId of the MRP?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 14, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We have run into a funny problem running MRP. If I have 100 qty in
>>>>>> stock
>>>>>>> and a sales order for 200, MRP generates a manufacturing order for
>> 200
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> not 100. Any idea why this is so?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Venkat
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Venkat
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Venkat
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Venkat
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Venkat

Reply via email to