These questions are a subset of questions that can be answered with a
comprehensive SDLC process document. If you don't have one already, I
recommend that you create one.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 10/23/2013 2:16 PM, Justin Dagostino wrote:
Thanks. Just confirming my assumptions. I liked the Debian package
management possibility, but it's been retired (and maybe should be removed
from the framework).
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Adrian Crum <
[email protected]> wrote:
If you don't want to use SVN or Ant on your production server, then you
have no choice - you must build it somewhere else and then copy it to the
production server.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 10/23/2013 2:04 PM, Justin Dagostino wrote:
Thanks again for the reply and the link. One thing that is not 100%
clear
is whether or not people are actually checking out from SVN (from whatever
branch) directly on production (and possibly running Ant tasks there as
well). I'd really like to avoid that.
If that's not what you are suggesting, do you recommend using the
vendor/branch strategy on a development server and then promoting it to
the
other various environments, including production, by archive/pack, copy to
the target environment(s), and unpacking on the target?
J
