It has been removed from the framework and put in Attic (ie in the repo history)
Jacques Justin Dagostino wrote: > Thanks. Just confirming my assumptions. I liked the Debian package > management possibility, but it's been retired (and maybe should be removed > from the framework). > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Adrian Crum < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If you don't want to use SVN or Ant on your production server, then you >> have no choice - you must build it somewhere else and then copy it to the >> production server. >> >> Adrian Crum >> Sandglass Software >> www.sandglass-software.com >> >> >> On 10/23/2013 2:04 PM, Justin Dagostino wrote: >> >>> Thanks again for the reply and the link. One thing that is not 100% >>> clear >>> is whether or not people are actually checking out from SVN (from whatever >>> branch) directly on production (and possibly running Ant tasks there as >>> well). I'd really like to avoid that. >>> >>> If that's not what you are suggesting, do you recommend using the >>> vendor/branch strategy on a development server and then promoting it to >>> the >>> other various environments, including production, by archive/pack, copy to >>> the target environment(s), and unpacking on the target? >>> >>> >>> J
