No way to know for sure without contacting the owner.
To build a useful new group, you have to get people to join your group
and that means doing some work to get content into your group and
building a core group of contributors that recommend the group to other
LinkedIn members.
Easier to join an existing group and post stuff there.
Ron
On 06/08/2014 3:10 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Ron,
I can understand that when talking about organisation specific support
groups, and there are a few. But apart from these and the open groups,
it seems to me that these closed groups were created to explore how
far the OFBiz community extends in order to execute some marketing
scheme (by its creator).
We can only guess about the intentions.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com <http://www.orrtiz.com/>
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ron,
In 2009 or thereabouts the PMC decided to adopt the Ubuntu way of
numbering OFBiz releases. Since then every year in april a release
was cut. But as the number of active committers is decreasing the
time to release a cut takes more time. Last year broke with that
policy, resulting in a release been cut with number 13.07.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com <http://www.orrtiz.com/>
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Ron Wheeler
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html page needs updating.
Is the 12.04.05 release date closer to being known?
The description of the Release number says that release
numbers consist of 2 parts
"The naming convention for OFBiz releases is*<Major Release
Number>.<Minor Release Number>"*
but the releases seem to have 3 digits. Patch description missing.
The 13.x.x series part of the page puzzles me.
It seems to indicate that some early versions 13.0.0, 13.07.01
should already be able to be downloaded.
It also seems to indicate that the 13.x.x will be released in
2014 which means that it should have a 14.x.x release number.
I am not sure why a non-standard pattern of release
identification was adopted but it is confusing and now
inconsistent.
It leads to the impression that the project is not active
since it missed 2013 altogether.
Would it not be possible/"good thing" to adopt a standard
pattern of releases where the first digit indicates major
change with some risk of serious work required to upgrade,
second digit indicating significant new functionality but no
change to the existing data structure or functions that are
not changing and the last digits indicating a minor bug fix?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 <tel:866-970-2435%2C%20ext%20102>
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: [email protected]
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
