Nice idea, thanks Rajesh!

Regards,

Sonal Patwari
Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>


On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I like the idea, +1.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Devanshu Vyas.
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but
> > the interpretation of the term may be  open or approximate to various
> > stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary.
> >
> >
> > We already have a glossary page
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Glossary
> > But it is not very exhaustive yet.
> >
> > I was planning to go through the BPRB pages and prepare a list of all
> > technical terms used in various pages for the purpose of enriching
> > (extending) the glossary.
> >
> > I invite opinions on whether it is worth ?
> >
> > My Arguments in favour:
> >
> > (1) We need a common plane for definitions, if there is a disparity
> between
> >       author's interpretation of a business term and the reader's or
> >       reviewer's interpretation there shall be a communication gap.
> >
> > (2) For newbies it is a great resource  because it increases their
> >       knowledge as well as ability of understanding more articles/pages.
> >
> > (3) consistency of articles: if all authors/contributors use the same
> > terminology
> >       then the content created by them shall relate to each other in a
> more
> >       consistent manner.
> >
> > Implementation notes:
> > ----------------------------
> > currently we have our glossary in a flat list format with is the easiest
> > way
> > to get started. However as the volume of terms and documentation
> increases
> > we shall also require to organise the glossary in a more methodical way.
> > Some of the relevant standards are W3C standards like SKOS [1]  , OWL[2].
> > I am not sure if confluence has components that allow organising
> vocabulary
> > at this moment.
> >
> > Even if its' not there we can continue to enrich the Glossary / Vocab in
> a
> > simple
> > manner (and later migrate/upgrade it).
> >
> >
> > References:
> > [1] https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL
> >
>

Reply via email to