Thanks Jacques , noted
regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > Rajesh, > > Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters. > > Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like > yours below. > > I replaced & by and and the page is now at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl > uence/display/OFBIZ/ScratchPad+for+collecting+Terms+and+Acronyms > > It's under Home wich is fine for now because it's only a temporary page. > Later we would want to move it directly under > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Documentation > > HTH > > Jacques > > > > Le 29/08/2017 à 13:23, Rajesh Mallah a écrit : > >> Thanks for the kind words everyone. >> >> I already created a scratchpad >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73635445 >> >> it is my first page and i feel it got created in a wrong place. :D >> >> request senior members to kindly relocate to a more suitable place. >> >> regds >> mallah. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 for the idea. >>> >>> Few More Suggestions: >>> >>> 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes >>> or >>> OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms like >>> ATP, >>> QOH, Back Order etc. >>> 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real world. So, >>> people can relate those terms to the framework. >>> >>> Also, I would like to contribute to this glossary enrichment effort too. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> >>> Shivangi Tanwar >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas < >>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I like the idea, +1. >>>> >>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>> Devanshu Vyas. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi , >>>>> >>>>> We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but >>>>> the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various >>>>> stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We already have a glossary page >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Glossary >>>>> But it is not very exhaustive yet. >>>>> >>>>> I was planning to go through the BPRB pages and prepare a list of all >>>>> technical terms used in various pages for the purpose of enriching >>>>> (extending) the glossary. >>>>> >>>>> I invite opinions on whether it is worth ? >>>>> >>>>> My Arguments in favour: >>>>> >>>>> (1) We need a common plane for definitions, if there is a disparity >>>>> >>>> between >>>> >>>>> author's interpretation of a business term and the reader's or >>>>> reviewer's interpretation there shall be a communication gap. >>>>> >>>>> (2) For newbies it is a great resource because it increases their >>>>> knowledge as well as ability of understanding more >>>>> >>>> articles/pages. >>> >>>> (3) consistency of articles: if all authors/contributors use the same >>>>> terminology >>>>> then the content created by them shall relate to each other in a >>>>> >>>> more >>>> >>>>> consistent manner. >>>>> >>>>> Implementation notes: >>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>> currently we have our glossary in a flat list format with is the >>>>> >>>> easiest >>> >>>> way >>>>> to get started. However as the volume of terms and documentation >>>>> >>>> increases >>>> >>>>> we shall also require to organise the glossary in a more methodical >>>>> >>>> way. >>> >>>> Some of the relevant standards are W3C standards like SKOS [1] , >>>>> >>>> OWL[2]. >>> >>>> I am not sure if confluence has components that allow organising >>>>> >>>> vocabulary >>>> >>>>> at this moment. >>>>> >>>>> Even if its' not there we can continue to enrich the Glossary / Vocab >>>>> >>>> in >>> >>>> a >>>> >>>>> simple >>>>> manner (and later migrate/upgrade it). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> References: >>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro >>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL >>>>> >>>>> >
