Hi Roman, AFAIK, 1.1.0 is a beta release, and the most recent stable release is 1.0.4, and I think it more reasonable to use a stable version, what's your opinion?
Some background on where the question comes from: we have successfully enabling oozie run on IBM JDK, and would like to contribute the changes back to community. However, while we testing the patch with original oozie branch, we find it still using hadoop-1.0.1, which misses HADOOP-6941(Adds support for building Hadoop with IBM's JDK), thus would have compile/UT error in IBM JDK. We also executed UT after changing the hadoop version to 1.0.4 in pom.xml and confirmed all UT could pass w/o error, so we wonder whether community would consider upgrade the hadoop version it specifies in the pom.xml. Looking forward to your reply, thanks! On 26 November 2012 14:13, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:37 PM, jinwei zhu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear oozie community, > > I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest > > version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not > the > > stablest version ? > > I'm not sure where this is coming from, but there's also Hadoop 1.1.0 > > > I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using > > hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie trunk, > > all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie > branch > > from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your > upgrade > > plan ? > > Personally I'd suggest bumping it to Hadoop 1.1.0 > > Thanks, > Roman. > -- Best Regards, Li Yu
