Hi, Yu Li
I have opened a jira for this upgrade. The jira number is 1088 . I
will upload my patch into jira .
Best Regards!
2012/11/26 Yu Li <[email protected]>
> Hi Roman,
>
> AFAIK, 1.1.0 is a beta release, and the most recent stable release is
> 1.0.4, and I think it more reasonable to use a stable version, what's your
> opinion?
>
> Some background on where the question comes from: we have successfully
> enabling oozie run on IBM JDK, and would like to contribute the changes
> back to community. However, while we testing the patch with original oozie
> branch, we find it still using hadoop-1.0.1, which misses HADOOP-6941(Adds
> support for building Hadoop with IBM's JDK), thus would have compile/UT
> error in IBM JDK. We also executed UT after changing the hadoop version to
> 1.0.4 in pom.xml and confirmed all UT could pass w/o error, so we wonder
> whether community would consider upgrade the hadoop version it specifies in
> the pom.xml.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thanks!
>
> On 26 November 2012 14:13, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:37 PM, jinwei zhu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Dear oozie community,
> > > I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest
> > > version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not
> > the
> > > stablest version ?
> >
> > I'm not sure where this is coming from, but there's also Hadoop 1.1.0
> >
> > > I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using
> > > hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie
> trunk,
> > > all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie
> > branch
> > > from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your
> > upgrade
> > > plan ?
> >
> > Personally I'd suggest bumping it to Hadoop 1.1.0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Li Yu
>
