Thank you both Serega and Lars for sharing the thoughts, greatly appreciated!
Jarcec On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 08:52:01AM +0200, Lars Francke wrote: > Thanks for the comments. > > @Serega: We're doing the same, would just be nice to have a built-in > way of doing things. > > @Jarek: Serega basically listed a lot of the points. We're also > maintaining some Impala compatible tables (replacing DECIMAL with > FLOAT as the former is not yet supported in Impala) that we build with > Impala. > > @Mohammad: Thanks. I'm not entirely sure if Impala can really be > generalized because its JDBC driver is rather limited (no commit etc.) > but I'll open an issue for the functionality. > > Cheers, > Lars > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > would you be open to share the use case? I was under impression that impala > > is more for a real-time queries that are executed either by users or BI > > tools rather then a part of larger background pipelines. > > > > Jarcec > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:49:06AM +0200, Lars Francke wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was looking for a Impala action in Oozie but couldn't find any > >> discussion about this at all. > >> > >> I'm thinking about opening a JIRA but I'm a) not sure if Oozie would > >> accept such an action or if it should live in a third-party (e.g. > >> Cloudera) extension and b) if it might be generalized into a JDBC > >> action where I can provide a JDBC driver, connection details and a SQL > >> script to execute. To me at least that'd have been helpful in the > >> past. > >> > >> I'm looking for opinions & guidance on whether either option would > >> make a good JIRA for the Oozie project. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Lars
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
