Hi, Purshotam/Satish, Is it possible to forward the slides/documentation presented in the talk, here in the list. Or you can upload them a provide a link.
Thanks, Abhishek > On Jun 30, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Purshotam Shah <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks, Robert. @Rohini, some people might have missed Oozie talk, so we will > have a short talk about complex dependencies. > Agenda of tomorrow meetup will1. Complex dependencies ( 2-3 min)2. Spark > action ( 3-5) min3. Oozie AM launcher ( 5-7 min)4. Q&A. > Thanks, > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:19 PM, satish saley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sure. Let me know your phone number, I will text you. > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Robert Kanter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually, I've been making good progress on the Oozie AM Launcher, so I can >> give a short presentation on it with a few slides and even a quick demo. >> >> @Puru or @Satish, would you be able to either message me or text me shortly >> before it's time and I can step out of the YARN BoF. >> >> >> - Robert >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Robert Kanter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I actually just updated the doc last night after running into some issues >>> with the unmanaged AM pool. The new approach discussed in it is simpler >>> and doesn't have any downsides compared to the unmanaged AM pool. >> Instead, >>> we'll just do a single (managed) AM per Action, where the launcher runs >> in >>> the AM. It's essentially like uber mode today, but with full control >> over >>> the AM and without the MapReduce stuff. There's more details in the 003 >>> doc. >>> >>> Given that the Oozie on Yarn stuff is still in its early stages, and that >>> I need to go to the YARN BoF at the same time so it will be difficult to >>> know when to step out for a few minutes for Oozie, perhaps this would be >>> best saved for next time? (or if we do meetups more than once a year) >>> Though Puru/Satish can feel free to vaguely mention it as something >> that's >>> being worked on. >>> >>> Another thing that might be good to mention is that Tomcat 6 is EoF at >> the >>> end of this year (and we've already seen some breakages that won't be >> fixed >>> with JSP and newer JDKs (OOZIE-2533)), and that we're going to be doing >>> what's described here >>> < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2317?focusedCommentId=15131559&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15131559 >>> >>> in OOZIE-2317. >>> >>> >>> - Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Puru, >>>> I am not sure if 1 and 3 make sense given that your talk on Oozie is >>>> also about the same and it will be a repeat of information. >>>> >>>> Robert, >>>> It would be good to talk about the Oozie and unmanaged AM branch >>>> work. Possible for you to do a 5 min talk or get someone else from >> Cloudera >>>> do that? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Rohini >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Purshotam Shah < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Two major highlights of next release are coordinator complex input >>>>> dependencies support and spark action. >>>>> If nobody has any suggestion we are planning to present >>>>> >>>>> 1. Coordinator complex input dependencies support (Puru)2. Spark action >>>>> (Satish)3. Y! experience of running Oozie (Puru and Satish) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 3:04 PM, Mohammad Islam >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> what in the next release plan? >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:53 PM, Purshotam Shah >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Checking again if anybody want to present anything or want us to cover >>>>> any topic. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 10:21 AM, Purshotam Shah >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, We are hosting Oozie BoF at Hadoop Summit San Jose. It will >> be >>>>> combined with Cloud & Operations. Lets you know if anybody want to >> present >>>>> anything or you want us to cover any topic. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
